A bitmap index is a special type of index that is tailored for being efficient for key columns with relatively few distinct values, i.e. low cardinality key columns. A bitmap index is created with the normal create index statement by putting the bitmap keyword in front of index, as follows:
create table customer (c_id int primary key, c_state char (2), c_gender char (1), .... ); create bitmap index c_gender on customer (c_gender); create bitmap index c_state on customer (c_state);
Bitmap indices offer space savings of up to 1000 x in some cases and specially for large tables the savings in I/O can be very significant.
A bitmap index can only be used on tables with an integer primary key or in other situations where the last effective key part of the index is an integer. This is understandable since a bitmap index uses a bitmap for representing the values of the last key part, thus having one bitmap for each distinct combination of leading key parts. In the above example, the customer table has an integer c_id column as primary key and a character for the customer's gender and a 2 character field for the state where the customer is located. Thus, to count all the male customers in Massachusetts, one will take the males bitmap and the MA bitmap and perform a bitwise AND of the two. This will have a 1 bit corresponding to the c_id of each male customer in Massachusetts.
We also note that in order to do the count, the customer table itself does not even have to be referenced, as the bitmaps hold all the information. Even if the table did have to be referenced, for example for adding up the outstanding credit of all male customers in Massachusetts, the bitwise AND could be done first and only the relevant rows would have to be retrieved from the table itself.
Virtuoso's implementation of bitmap indices is designed to work efficiently even when the leading key parts have relatively high cardinality, i.e. many distinct values, causing there to be a large number of mostly empty bitmaps. Of course, if each bitmap has only one bit set, for example if every customer is in a different state, there is no benefit to bitmap indices. On the other hand, there is also almost no penalty, only 6 bytes more per index entry than for a regular index. Therefore, for any non-unique key where bitmap indices are applicable, even if there are only a few repeated values, bitmap indices are a safe choice. If there are at least 2 times more rows than distinct values of the keys, space savings are certain.
A bitmap index may have any number of key parts of any type, provided that the last effective part is an integer or and IRI id. The last key parts of an index are those primary key parts that do not occur elsewhere in the key. Thus, if the primary key is a single integer, bitmap indices are always applicable. However, supposing the primary key were an integer plus a string, it would be possible to make a bitmap index where the string were first, followed by the integer. This would make sense and save space if the string were not unique by itself. As another example, the RDF_QUAD system table, the default location of the Virtuoso RDF triple store, has the columns P, G, O and S, where all are IRI ID's, except for O which is ANY. Thus, The primary key is the concatenation of all columns, by default in the order GSPO. There is another key in the order PGOS which can be implemented as a bitmap index because S is an IRI ID, hence integer-like for purposes of bitmap indices.